6 Comments

Thank you for outlining this clear and inspiring call to action, Shabnam! I have added this to my growing list of action steps after my letter objecting to the IHR amendments:

• “Letter to the US HHS Office of Global Affairs” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-us-hhs-office-of-global)

I also added this article to the list of resources.

Have you seen this post from Interest of Justice in which they share a link (https://interestofjustice.org/) to their Notice of Claim?

• “We knew The HHS & WHO were DOOMED to failure and would not achieve the proposed IHR Amendments” (https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/we-knew-the-hhs-and-who-was-doomed)

Should we use a different hashtag like #StopTheAccord, or should we keep using #StopTheTreaty?

Here’s to the power of the people! 🙌

Expand full comment

Thank you Mary for your commitment to health and freedom! I'm familiar with the incredible work of IOJ, they are an invaluable WCH partner. Let's #StopTheAccord. #PowerToThePeople

Expand full comment

It doesn’t matter what they call it. The US government doesn’t have the right to usurp the constitution by turning authority of the US over to any body outside the nation, voted on or not.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the links- so much easier

Expand full comment

I think its time to disband WHO and start again.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 4, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Good question. A treaty can be called a convention, protocol or accord, although each does have its own, sometimes overlapping, definition. Accord means agreement on concurrence of opinion, will or action, whereas treaty means a binding agreement - when canvassed, consented to, voted on, and ratified. While some definitions imply that a treaty is binding while an accord is is not, it is the substance of the document that makes the difference. In law, what is the intention?

Expand full comment