I don't have personal knowledge of who is covering for whom but it seems clear that there is collusion at top levels including Pharma and the military industrial complex. Suffice to say that none of that collusion is in our interests!
It is frightening that the best people I know, those at the top of their field, the thinkers, the big hearted people, the defenders of justice and the children would all by the definition of these heartless entities be considered enemies of the State. Yes, that's a good question, who is the State exactly? to have any legal standing the definition needs to be clear.
1. It seems so. 2. No.
I don't have personal knowledge of who is covering for whom but it seems clear that there is collusion at top levels including Pharma and the military industrial complex. Suffice to say that none of that collusion is in our interests!
It is frightening that the best people I know, those at the top of their field, the thinkers, the big hearted people, the defenders of justice and the children would all by the definition of these heartless entities be considered enemies of the State. Yes, that's a good question, who is the State exactly? to have any legal standing the definition needs to be clear.
Videos/audios are great for some; but I prefer written information
The link to Katherine's substack is on her name