What's the catch? Vaccine Injured Can Sue Manufacturers - Despite Indemnity
Word salad: "This means the vaccine injured can sue the manufacturers, though the Government will foot the bill."
Some striking clarity before reading this article. This is important. Volume up…
There is no such thing as government money. Say it slowly - again, and again, and again.
This means civilians will foot pharma’s bill for harms after taking the shots.
Read this article by Will Jones in the Daily Sceptic - 15 November 2022: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/11/15/government-clarifies-vaccine-injured-can-sue-manufacturers-despite-indemnity/
“The Government has responded to a petition calling on it to “remove indemnity from the manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, to allow individuals to pursue claims for compensation against them” by clarifying that “individuals’ right to sue the producers of the vaccine” has not been removed.
Instead, the indemnity “determines who will pay the manufacturer’s losses arising from such a claim”. This means the vaccine injured can sue the manufacturers, though the Government will foot the bill.
The Government’s response states:
In August 2021, amendments to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 were made to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the legislation provides partial immunity from civil liability for vaccines supplied under emergency authorisation, it preserves individuals’ right to sue the producers of the vaccine under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. This provides an important level of protection if the safety of the product is not such as people are generally entitled to expect, taking all circumstances into account, and if that defect causes personal injury.
In relation to compensation from the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, the Government adds that “the figure of £120,000 is a one-off lump-sum payment, not designed to cover lifetime costs for those impacted”.
“A successful claim to VDPS does not stop an individual from bringing litigation against the vaccine manufacturer for damages as the VDPS is not a compensation scheme,” it adds.
The Government’s full response to the petition is as follows.
The Government cannot comment on the terms on which COVID-19 vaccines were supplied as these are confidential.
Even though the COVID-19 vaccines have been developed at pace, at no point and at no stage of development has safety been bypassed. These vaccines have satisfied, in full, all the necessary requirements for safety, effectiveness and quality.
The speed of the vaccine rollout put the U.K. in a strong position. The U.K. was the first country in the world to grant a temporary authorisation for and deploy the Pfizer and Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. The U.K. was the first major European economy and first G20 member to vaccinate 50% of its population with at least one dose, and to provide boosters to 50% of the population.
The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines rollout have been demonstrated in terms of public health and allowing the gradual and safe removal of restrictions on everyday life over the past 18 months.
In general, indemnities given to manufacturers do not prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim against a manufacturer for compensation. Rather, the indemnity determines who will pay the manufacturer’s losses arising from such a claim.Although the details of indemnity schemes are commercially confidential, we understand that many governments entered into such arrangements to ensure ready access to COVID-19 vaccines.
In August 2021, amendments to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 were made to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the legislation provides partial immunity from civil liability for vaccines supplied under emergency authorisation, it preserves individuals’ right to sue the producers of the vaccine under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. This provides an important level of protection if the safety of the product is not such as people are generally entitled to expect, taking all circumstances into account, and if that defect causes personal injury.
The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is a no-fault scheme that provides a one-off, tax-free payment of £120,000 to claimants who have been found, on the balance of probabilities, to have been seriously disabled as a result of a vaccine for a disease listed in the Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979. The figure of £120,000 is a one-off lump-sum payment, not designed to cover lifetime costs for those impacted.
It is in addition to the Government support package to those with a disability or long-term health condition, including Statutory Sick Pay, Universal Credit, Employment and Support Allowance, Attendance Allowance, and Personal Independence Payments.
A successful claim to VDPS does not stop an individual from bringing litigation against the vaccine manufacturer for damages as the VDPS is not a compensation scheme.
This means that, notwithstanding the indemnity, the vaccine injured can bring action for damages against the vaccine manufacturers, albeit with taxpayers on the hook for the bill.” - Daily Sceptic.
Meanwhile, Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse takes action with criminal changes:
And last, but not least, a subject we must keep engaging: What is in the shots?
Yes, taxpayers who paid for the poisonous experimental biologicals now get to pay for all the adverse events and deaths caused by these dangerous injections. Yes, it makes perfect sense, if you have some sort of a deranged mind, like most of our gov’ts apoear to have. 🥲🥲
The great Scamdemic implications & costs, have now become the GREAT ScamCashDemic.